Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 238,769,704 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.523% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 522.9 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $37,550, a difference of 45.3%), median male earnings ($63,715 compared to $46,244, a difference of 37.8%), and median family income ($120,076 compared to $87,191, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $51,447, a difference of 4.6%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $53,950, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 53.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 47.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 25.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 38.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.1%), married-couple households (45.4% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households (61.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.0%), no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 106.1%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 97.5%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 94.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 19.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.61%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.5%).