Crow vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,816,616 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.454. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.346% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 345.9 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $37,550, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $75,123, a difference of 18.0%), and wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $35,444, a difference of 0.50%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $40,851, a difference of 5.5%), and median male earnings ($42,434 compared to $46,244, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 82.3%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 69.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 5.9%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 204.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 199.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 196.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.5%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.41, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.36%), married-couple households (41.4% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.48%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 118.2%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.6% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (99.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and kindergarten (99.7% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%).