Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Immigrants from Chile

Excellent
Good
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,693,302 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.216% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 216.2 Immigrants from Chile.
Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $52,440, a difference of 4.1%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $88,388, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $97,159, a difference of 0.080%), median earnings ($47,640 compared to $47,697, a difference of 0.12%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $103,412, a difference of 0.12%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Average
25.7%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.54%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.5%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
12.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Average
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Average
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Good
11.5%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.1%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.5%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 30.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.5%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Good
31.2%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 105.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.1%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Poor
6.1%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%