Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,572,023 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 36.5%), per capita income ($38,766 compared to $46,213, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $103,412, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,038 compared to $52,440, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $40,353, a difference of 4.5%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $47,697, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 26.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.7%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.6%), no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.6%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%).