Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,533,869 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.429% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 428.9 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $46,213, a difference of 10.2%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $55,954, a difference of 9.8%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $105,655, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $52,440, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $62,354, a difference of 3.1%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.3%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.65%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.1%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.75%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.6%), no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.4%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.5%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.61%).