Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,434,548 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to a decrease of 9.3 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $46,213, a difference of 9.1%), median male earnings ($60,914 compared to $55,954, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($51,581 compared to $47,697, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $62,354, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $52,440, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.0%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.33%), family households (63.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.1%), bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.0%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%).