Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Immigrants from the Azores

Good
Poor
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,213,177 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.208% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 207.7 Immigrants from the Azores.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $52,121, a difference of 16.2%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $39,608, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $95,402, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $38,573, a difference of 0.43%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $45,812, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $52,621, a difference of 2.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from the Azores
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$39,608
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Tragic
$95,402
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Tragic
$80,357
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Fair
$45,812
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Fair
$53,503
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Good
$52,621
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Fair
$92,322
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Tragic
$94,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Tragic
$52,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
27.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 59.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 39.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 8.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from the Azores
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Tragic
18.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
32.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
15.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
16.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.8%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from the Azores
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from the Azores
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
80.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 28.0%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.6%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from the Azores
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
45.1%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
39.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from the Azores
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Excellent
56.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 87.5%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.8%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from the Azores
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
93.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
92.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
90.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
89.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
87.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
85.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
82.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
78.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
54.7%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
48.4%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
35.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from the Azores
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
50.9%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
3.0%