Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,039,955 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.509% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 509.5 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $39,608, a difference of 31.8%), householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $52,121, a difference of 26.9%), and median family income ($115,847 compared to $95,402, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.49%), householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $52,621, a difference of 3.2%), and median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $38,573, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 63.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 35.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.3%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 112.5%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 84.0%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 77.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.4%).