Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,064,600 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.106% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 106.0 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $52,121, a difference of 20.9%), per capita income ($45,066 compared to $39,608, a difference of 13.8%), and median family income ($107,715 compared to $95,402, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $52,621, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $92,322, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 53.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 36.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.96%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.3%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 67.7%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 57.7%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 97.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 37.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 15.9%).