Pima vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,479,480 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.902. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.477% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 477.2 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,987, a difference of 46.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $102,261, a difference of 39.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $85,797, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,247, a difference of 0.50%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,109, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $95,560, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 152.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 120.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 103.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 30.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 167.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 134.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 128.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 80.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 69.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 46.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 70.4%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 67.5%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 65.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.6%).