Uruguayan vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,853,676 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 53.8 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 9.2%), householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $61,270, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $102,261, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $39,109, a difference of 0.30%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $85,797, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($44,318 compared to $44,987, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.8%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and college, under 1 year (64.2% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%).