Bhutanese vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,199,015 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $61,270, a difference of 18.0%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $85,797, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $102,261, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.8%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $44,987, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $51,247, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 23.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.98%).