Crow vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,857,971 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 233.7 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 44.1%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $44,987, a difference of 41.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $102,261, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $51,247, a difference of 9.0%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,109, a difference of 10.9%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $46,916, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 111.2%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 108.3%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 92.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 30.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 256.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 227.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 219.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.8%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.94%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 51.5%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 45.7%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.3%).