Pima vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,606,902 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 45.6 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,766, a difference of 23.2%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $75,961, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $87,705, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,525, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $82,331, a difference of 0.60%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,695, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 62.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 61.4%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 128.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 102.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 85.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 38.7%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 63.5%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 33.6%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (81.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 51.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.3%).