Crow vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,574,357 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 10.5 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,681 compared to $75,961, a difference of 19.3%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $37,766, a difference of 19.0%), and wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $35,695, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $41,205, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $51,525, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 82.0%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 69.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 205.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 202.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 198.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.6%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.40, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.10%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 111.0%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 2.5%), nursery school (99.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and kindergarten (99.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%).