Ethiopian vs Guatemalan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Guatemalan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ethiopians
Guatemalans
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guatemalan Integration in Ethiopian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,654,027 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 78.0 Guatemalans.
Ethiopian vs Guatemalan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,569 compared to $37,766, a difference of 23.3%), median family income ($108,251 compared to $88,295, a difference of 22.6%), and median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $35,695, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $51,525, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $82,331, a difference of 17.6%).
Income Metric | Ethiopian | Guatemalan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,569 | Tragic $37,766 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,251 | Tragic $88,295 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,640 | Tragic $75,961 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,572 | Tragic $41,205 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,243 | Tragic $46,736 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,243 | Tragic $35,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,818 | Poor $51,525 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,824 | Tragic $82,331 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,736 | Tragic $87,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,989 | Tragic $54,526 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Ethiopian vs Guatemalan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.9%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 35.8%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 19.8%).
Poverty Metric | Ethiopian | Guatemalan |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Tragic 21.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.5% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Ethiopian vs Guatemalan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Ethiopian | Guatemalan |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Ethiopian vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ethiopian | Guatemalan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.0% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.2% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 81.2% |
Ethiopian vs Guatemalan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 24.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.2% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 0.20%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Ethiopian | Guatemalan |
Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Exceptional 3.40 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 37.1% |
Ethiopian vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ethiopian | Guatemalan |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Ethiopian vs Guatemalan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 66.5%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 54.4%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Ethiopian | Guatemalan |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 96.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 96.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 94.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 91.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Tragic 89.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 87.9% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Tragic 86.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Fair 89.0% | Tragic 82.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 56.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.8% | Tragic 31.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Ethiopian vs Guatemalan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.0%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Ethiopian | Guatemalan |
Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |