Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 387,904,678 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $82,331, a difference of 43.4%), median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $46,736, a difference of 43.1%), and per capita income ($53,806 compared to $37,766, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $51,525, a difference of 10.9%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $54,526, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 61.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 60.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.7%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 57.0%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.4%), and births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.40, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 109.9%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 89.3%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 32.9%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.2%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.2%).