Immigrants from Jordan vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,392,886 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 114.7 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $79,171, a difference of 34.1%), median family income ($107,715 compared to $81,852, a difference of 31.6%), and median household income ($89,412 compared to $68,412, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.13%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $45,816, a difference of 12.1%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $34,106, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 49.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 45.0%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 15.2%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 32.6%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.39%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 52.8%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 70.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.6%).