Crow vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,358,558 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 60.5 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 38.1%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $35,922, a difference of 13.2%), and median male earnings ($42,434 compared to $46,656, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $50,475, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $45,816, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $34,106, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 57.7%), married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 48.3%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.1%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and single female poverty (32.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 220.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 218.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 183.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.1%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.23, a difference of 18.3%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.61%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and family households (65.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.28%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.9%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.9%).