Immigrants from Latvia vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,113,653 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.315% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 314.6 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $35,922, a difference of 41.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $79,171, a difference of 40.8%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $81,852, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $45,816, a difference of 12.9%), and median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $34,106, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 49.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 49.2%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 39.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.5%), currently married (46.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.5%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 79.3%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 79.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 54.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.8%).