Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Dutch West Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Dutch West Indians
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,533,400 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733 and weighted average of 27.5%, a difference of 4.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Dutch West Indian |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 18.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 88.9% | 82.0% |
| Mean | 35.8% | 42.0% |
| Median | 30.6% | 34.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 27.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.2% | 53.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 26.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 21.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 20.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Dutch West Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Apache (27.7%, a difference of 0.91%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.96%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |