Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,022,893 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.654% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to a decrease of 654.3 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($95,319 compared to $101,681, a difference of 6.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $118,426, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $112,666, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $44,586, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($52,361 compared to $53,690, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 11.3%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), poverty (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.8%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.11%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.7%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.17%), college, under 1 year (69.6% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and associate's degree (51.9% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Asian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.3%).