Choctaw vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,824,526 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 26.4 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $101,681, a difference of 45.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $112,666, a difference of 44.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $118,426, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $57,003, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $68,822, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 68.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 46.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 37.7%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 32.8%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.0%), family households (64.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 70.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 68.0%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 74.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 73.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.0%).