Czechoslovakian vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,424,419 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.391. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.162% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 161.7 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,965 compared to $101,681, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $112,666, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $118,426, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $57,003, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $68,822, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.3%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 19.6%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.83%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 48.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.76%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.3%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.79%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.9%).