Canadian vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 431,058,285 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 28.2 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,769 compared to $101,681, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $112,666, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $118,426, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $57,003, a difference of 8.9%), and per capita income ($45,858 compared to $50,057, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.040%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 19.2%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.18%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.79%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 43.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.6%).