Scottish vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,841,152 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 58.0 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 21.1%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $40,889, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $47,854, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $50,923, a difference of 0.73%), median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $55,290, a difference of 0.91%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $61,177, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.9%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.91%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 68.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.9%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.1%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.7%).