Bhutanese vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Ugandans

Exceptional
Average
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,754,806 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 111.4 Ugandans.
Bhutanese Integration in Ugandan Communities

Bhutanese vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $61,177, a difference of 18.2%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $87,557, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $103,472, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $40,889, a difference of 6.8%), median earnings ($52,297 compared to $47,854, a difference of 9.3%), and per capita income ($49,894 compared to $45,047, a difference of 10.8%).
Bhutanese vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricBhutaneseUgandan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
24.1%

Bhutanese vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 37.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 36.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.6%), single male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.4%).
Bhutanese vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseUgandan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
12.2%

Bhutanese vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 49.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Bhutanese vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseUgandan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%

Bhutanese vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.40%).
Bhutanese vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Exceptional
83.7%

Bhutanese vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.1%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.50%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
Bhutanese vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseUgandan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
30.1%

Bhutanese vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.3%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.1%).
Bhutanese vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Bhutanese vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.8%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and college, 1 year or more (64.6% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Bhutanese vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%

Bhutanese vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Bhutanese vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseUgandan
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%