Choctaw vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Ugandans

Fair
Average
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,136,853 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Ugandans.
Choctaw Integration in Ugandan Communities

Choctaw vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $103,472, a difference of 25.8%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $106,541, a difference of 25.6%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $87,557, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $50,923, a difference of 12.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $61,177, a difference of 15.3%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $55,290, a difference of 15.8%).
Choctaw vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricChoctawUgandan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
24.1%

Choctaw vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (17.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 37.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 35.1%), and single female poverty (27.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.63%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 9.9%).
Choctaw vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawUgandan
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Fair
12.2%

Choctaw vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.82%).
Choctaw vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawUgandan
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%

Choctaw vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.3%).
Choctaw vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
83.7%

Choctaw vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 22.6%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Choctaw vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawUgandan
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Excellent
30.1%

Choctaw vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.3%).
Choctaw vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Choctaw vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 58.5%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 55.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and 8th grade (96.2% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Choctaw vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Choctaw vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.8%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 13.8%).
Choctaw vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricChoctawUgandan
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%