Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,163,717 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 7.3 Soviet Union.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $54,202, a difference of 36.1%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $119,262, a difference of 26.2%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $63,382, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $62,848, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $55,340, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 67.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 66.3%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.8%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.7%).