Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Soviet Union

Exceptional
Good
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,157,034 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.914. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 20.5 Soviet Union.
Bhutanese Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $62,848, a difference of 15.0%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and per capita income ($49,894 compared to $54,202, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($119,800 compared to $119,262, a difference of 0.45%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $108,457, a difference of 0.98%), and median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $63,382, a difference of 2.6%).
Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricBhutaneseSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
24.2%

Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 36.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 34.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.0%).
Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseSoviet Union
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
11.1%

Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseSoviet Union
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Good
83.0%

Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.7%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.28%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.11, a difference of 4.3%).
Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseSoviet Union
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
26.3%

Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 100.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 76.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 10.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.9%).
Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
4.4%

Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.7%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.5%

Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 23.7%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Bhutanese vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseSoviet Union
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Fair
2.5%