Pima vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,014,478 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.131% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 131.3 Soviet Union.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $54,202, a difference of 76.9%), median family income ($77,431 compared to $119,262, a difference of 54.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $112,008, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,340, a difference of 7.4%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $62,848, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 134.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 120.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 108.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 45.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 166.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 144.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 136.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 132.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 95.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.3%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 77.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 55.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 121.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 106.5%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 98.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 84.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 74.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 12.2%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.8%).