Romanian vs Slavic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Slavs

Excellent
Good
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slavic Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,036,330 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 74.5 Slavs.
Romanian Integration in Slavic Communities

Romanian vs Slavic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $45,049, a difference of 7.5%), median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $56,390, a difference of 6.5%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $86,398, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $61,709, a difference of 3.9%), and median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $39,613, a difference of 5.2%).
Romanian vs Slavic Income
Income MetricRomanianSlavic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Excellent
$45,049
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Good
$105,144
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Good
$86,398
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Excellent
$47,470
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Excellent
$56,390
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Average
$39,613
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$50,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Good
$96,377
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Good
$102,629
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Good
$61,709
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Romanian vs Slavic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.8%), single female poverty (19.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.32%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.75%).
Romanian vs Slavic Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianSlavic
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.6%

Romanian vs Slavic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.60%).
Romanian vs Slavic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianSlavic
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.2%

Romanian vs Slavic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
Romanian vs Slavic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianSlavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Good
82.9%

Romanian vs Slavic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 10.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (64.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Romanian vs Slavic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianSlavic
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Average
31.6%

Romanian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
Romanian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianSlavic
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Excellent
6.6%

Romanian vs Slavic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.2%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
Romanian vs Slavic Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianSlavic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Excellent
66.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
1.9%

Romanian vs Slavic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.15%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Romanian vs Slavic Disability
Disability MetricRomanianSlavic
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Fair
2.5%