Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Slavs

Good
Good
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slavic Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,841,940 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.173% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 173.3 Slavs.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Slavic Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $45,049, a difference of 2.8%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $39,613, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $102,629, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $50,563, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $96,377, a difference of 1.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianSlavic
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Excellent
$45,049
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Good
$105,144
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Good
$86,398
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Excellent
$47,470
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Excellent
$56,390
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Average
$39,613
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Tragic
$50,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Good
$96,377
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Good
$102,629
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Good
$61,709
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
27.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.6%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 0.62%), female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.77%).
Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianSlavic
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.89%).
Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianSlavic
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.36%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianSlavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Good
82.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.3%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.030%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianSlavic
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Average
31.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.5%).
Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianSlavic
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.1%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianSlavic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Excellent
66.7%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Good
1.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
Czechoslovakian vs Slavic Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianSlavic
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Fair
2.5%