Hungarian vs Slavic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hungarians

Slavs

Good
Good
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slavic Integration in Hungarian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,029,005 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.758. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 102.6 Slavs.
Hungarian Integration in Slavic Communities

Hungarian vs Slavic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.8%), median male earnings ($57,309 compared to $56,390, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,913 compared to $102,629, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $61,709, a difference of 0.060%), median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $39,613, a difference of 0.26%), and median family income ($105,609 compared to $105,144, a difference of 0.44%).
Hungarian vs Slavic Income
Income MetricHungarianSlavic
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,426
Excellent
$45,049
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,609
Good
$105,144
Median Household Income
Good
$86,920
Good
$86,398
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,795
Excellent
$47,470
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,309
Excellent
$56,390
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,510
Average
$39,613
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,247
Tragic
$50,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,544
Good
$96,377
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,913
Good
$102,629
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,673
Good
$61,709
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Hungarian vs Slavic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.5%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.61%).
Hungarian vs Slavic Poverty
Poverty MetricHungarianSlavic
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Average
11.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.2%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Fair
21.1%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.6%

Hungarian vs Slavic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.91%).
Hungarian vs Slavic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHungarianSlavic
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Excellent
5.2%

Hungarian vs Slavic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.53%).
Hungarian vs Slavic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHungarianSlavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.2%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.8%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.7%
Good
82.9%

Hungarian vs Slavic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.5%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.97%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Hungarian vs Slavic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHungarianSlavic
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.1%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Average
31.6%

Hungarian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.94%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Hungarian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHungarianSlavic
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.5%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Hungarian vs Slavic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 3.6%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and associate's degree (46.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Hungarian vs Slavic Education Level
Education Level MetricHungarianSlavic
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Excellent
66.7%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.5%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.7%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.3%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.6%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Good
1.9%

Hungarian vs Slavic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.56%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.86%).
Hungarian vs Slavic Disability
Disability MetricHungarianSlavic
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Fair
2.5%