Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Sioux

Good
Fair
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,615,545 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.910% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 1,910.5 Sioux.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Sioux Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $33,921, a difference of 29.1%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $82,386, a difference of 25.4%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $67,792, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $46,417, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $35,063, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $52,509, a difference of 15.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianSioux
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
24.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 100.0%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 98.2%), and male poverty (10.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 30.4%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 39.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 42.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianSioux
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
16.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 84.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 74.5%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianSioux
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
78.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 44.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 43.3%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianSioux
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
41.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 5.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianSioux
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.0%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 28.5%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianSioux
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.52%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianSioux
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Fair
2.5%