Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Sioux

Fair
Fair
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,683,041 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 32.2 Sioux.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Sioux Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $33,921, a difference of 17.4%), median household income ($78,682 compared to $67,792, a difference of 16.1%), and median family income ($94,472 compared to $82,386, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $46,417, a difference of 5.0%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $35,063, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSioux
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Exceptional
24.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 69.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 51.2%), and family poverty (10.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 26.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 30.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSioux
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
16.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 87.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 81.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 76.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSioux
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
7.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
78.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.3%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSioux
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
41.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.61%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSioux
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 77.6%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.44%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and high school diploma (86.7% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSioux
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarSioux
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Fair
2.5%