Luxembourger vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Sioux

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,095,913 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 53.4 Sioux.
Luxembourger Integration in Sioux Communities

Luxembourger vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $33,921, a difference of 34.6%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $82,386, a difference of 28.9%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $67,792, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $46,417, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $35,063, a difference of 13.8%).
Luxembourger vs Sioux Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerSioux
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.3%

Luxembourger vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 124.3%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 119.6%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 96.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 36.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 36.9%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 39.6%).
Luxembourger vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerSioux
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
16.8%

Luxembourger vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 94.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 87.2%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 84.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.4%).
Luxembourger vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerSioux
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.9%

Luxembourger vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 7.8%).
Luxembourger vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
78.0%

Luxembourger vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 52.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.52, a difference of 13.3%).
Luxembourger vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerSioux
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
41.0%

Luxembourger vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 87.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 3.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.2%).
Luxembourger vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerSioux
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.0%

Luxembourger vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 43.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 41.0%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Luxembourger vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerSioux
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 30.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.6%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.0%).
Luxembourger vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerSioux
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.5%