Immigrants from Jamaica vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,133,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Jamaica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jamaica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jamaica corresponds to an increase of 30.3 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 34.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,035 compared to $98,340, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,298 compared to $93,661, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,625 compared to $39,376, a difference of 1.9%), per capita income ($38,766 compared to $41,495, a difference of 7.0%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $46,333, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 42.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.7%), births to unmarried women (38.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 27.5%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 112.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 79.6%), and no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 39.5%), and no vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 49.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.6%), master's degree (13.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jamaica and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 50.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.4%).