Immigrants from Congo vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,625,537 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.857% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 1,857.4 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $93,661, a difference of 29.8%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $55,543, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $98,340, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $39,376, a difference of 14.7%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $41,495, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $59,934, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 49.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 47.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 48.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.8%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.42%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 78.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 55.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.57%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.6% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.0%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.2%).