Immigrants from Croatia vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,679,394 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.892% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 891.7 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,417 compared to $41,495, a difference of 21.5%), median family income ($112,323 compared to $97,958, a difference of 14.7%), and median male earnings ($60,914 compared to $53,704, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $55,543, a difference of 2.2%), wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $59,934, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 31.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.43%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.3%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 75.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 53.4%), and no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 72.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.2%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.2%).