Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Potawatomi

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Potawatomi Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,882,398 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 8.9 Potawatomi.
Luxembourger Integration in Potawatomi Communities

Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $84,613, a difference of 22.4%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $88,265, a difference of 20.3%), and per capita income ($45,663 compared to $38,046, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $46,462, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $54,212, a difference of 12.5%).
Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerPotawatomi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$38,046
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$88,265
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$72,576
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$41,288
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$48,768
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$34,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$46,462
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$81,774
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$84,613
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$54,212
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
27.7%

Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 42.2%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 13.5%).
Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerPotawatomi
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
23.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
34.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
12.5%

Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 44.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerPotawatomi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerPotawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
62.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.0%

Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.0%).
Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerPotawatomi
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
36.2%

Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 65.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerPotawatomi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.3%

Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.6%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.2%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerPotawatomi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Average
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
61.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
54.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
40.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 39.4%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.0%).
Luxembourger vs Potawatomi Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerPotawatomi
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%