Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,984,700 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.823. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.520% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 520.3 Potawatomi.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $38,046, a difference of 36.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $84,613, a difference of 32.3%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $88,265, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $46,462, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $54,212, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 42.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 27.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.71%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 63.5%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 53.7%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 48.0%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 32.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 8.7%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.0%).