Uruguayan vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,374,831 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.696. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.186% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 186.4 Potawatomi.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,691 compared to $72,576, a difference of 16.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $84,613, a difference of 16.6%), and per capita income ($44,318 compared to $38,046, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $54,212, a difference of 9.0%), median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $48,768, a difference of 10.1%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 32.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 26.0%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.4%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 9.5%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.45%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and family households (64.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.3%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 27.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 30.0%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.0%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 48.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 44.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.2%).