Pima vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,552,942 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 66.5 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $40,669, a difference of 32.7%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $94,448, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $49,348, a difference of 4.4%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $37,024, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $88,301, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 114.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 95.4%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 87.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 20.0%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 27.6%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 141.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 106.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 88.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 70.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 44.9%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 78.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 47.2%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 44.1%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 54.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.3%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.2%).