Immigrants from Latin America vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,694,035 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.995. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.887% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 886.6 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 14.6%), median male earnings ($46,941 compared to $52,170, a difference of 11.1%), and median family income ($86,989 compared to $96,231, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $49,348, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $37,024, a difference of 4.9%), and median household income ($75,420 compared to $79,429, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (23.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.53%), single mother poverty (32.4% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (67.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 83.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.34%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.1%).