Immigrants from Romania vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,014,354 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.517% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 516.6 Nonimmigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,463 compared to $40,669, a difference of 21.6%), median household income ($94,222 compared to $79,429, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,713 compared to $88,301, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.60%), householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $57,426, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $49,348, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 30.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 27.4%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.20%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.9%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%).