Romanian vs Mongolian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Mongolian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Mongolians

Excellent
Good
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Mongolian Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,071,951 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Mongolians.
Romanian Integration in Mongolian Communities

Romanian vs Mongolian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.0%), median family income ($111,243 compared to $114,553, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $111,602, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $60,350, a difference of 0.48%), per capita income ($48,445 compared to $49,173, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($50,244 compared to $51,038, a difference of 1.6%).
Romanian vs Mongolian Income
Income MetricRomanianMongolian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Exceptional
$49,173
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Exceptional
$114,553
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Exceptional
$93,971
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Exceptional
$51,038
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Exceptional
$60,350
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Exceptional
$42,542
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Good
$52,540
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Exceptional
$104,578
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Exceptional
$111,602
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Exceptional
$65,326
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Poor
26.6%

Romanian vs Mongolian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.8%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.67%).
Romanian vs Mongolian Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianMongolian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Average
12.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Excellent
15.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
27.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.5%

Romanian vs Mongolian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.49%).
Romanian vs Mongolian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianMongolian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Romanian vs Mongolian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.37%).
Romanian vs Mongolian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianMongolian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.3%

Romanian vs Mongolian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.3%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.56%), and family households (64.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Romanian vs Mongolian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianMongolian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
27.9%

Romanian vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%).
Romanian vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianMongolian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
13.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
87.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Tragic
18.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%

Romanian vs Mongolian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.1%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%).
Romanian vs Mongolian Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianMongolian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Excellent
91.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Exceptional
64.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
53.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Exceptional
45.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
19.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.8%

Romanian vs Mongolian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Romanian vs Mongolian Disability
Disability MetricRomanianMongolian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
21.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%