Cherokee vs Mongolian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Mongolian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Mongolians
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Mongolian Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,538,616 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Mongolians.
Cherokee vs Mongolian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $49,173, a difference of 32.2%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $114,553, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $111,602, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $52,540, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $65,326, a difference of 20.7%).
Income Metric | Cherokee | Mongolian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Exceptional $49,173 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Exceptional $114,553 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Exceptional $93,971 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Exceptional $51,038 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Exceptional $60,350 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Exceptional $42,542 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Good $52,540 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Exceptional $104,578 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Exceptional $111,602 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Exceptional $65,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Poor 26.6% |
Cherokee vs Mongolian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 34.2%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.96%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Mongolian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Excellent 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Excellent 15.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Cherokee vs Mongolian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Mongolian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Cherokee vs Mongolian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Mongolian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Cherokee vs Mongolian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 31.4%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.8%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.34%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.45%), and married-couple households (46.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.92%).
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Mongolian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Cherokee vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 69.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 26.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Mongolian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Tragic 87.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Tragic 52.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Cherokee vs Mongolian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 89.9%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 86.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.15%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Mongolian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Good 94.0% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Excellent 93.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Excellent 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 89.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Exceptional 53.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cherokee vs Mongolian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 54.6%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.1%).
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Mongolian |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |