Bhutanese vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,258,612 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 0.1 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $65,326, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $52,540, a difference of 8.6%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $93,971, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $49,173, a difference of 1.5%), and median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $60,350, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and family poverty (7.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.9%), single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.12%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 50.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.9%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.4%).