Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Mexican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Mexicans

Good
Tragic
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,179
SOCIAL INDEX
9.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
319th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Mexican Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 365,259,857 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.173% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 172.8 Mexicans.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Mexican Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $34,559, a difference of 26.8%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $85,618, a difference of 20.6%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $46,147, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $49,989, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $53,897, a difference of 12.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianMexican
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$34,559
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Tragic
$85,618
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Tragic
$74,399
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Tragic
$39,834
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$46,147
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Tragic
$33,664
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Tragic
$49,989
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Tragic
$80,427
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Tragic
$86,816
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Tragic
$53,897
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Fair
26.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 65.0%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 47.7%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianMexican
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
16.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
16.6%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Tragic
21.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
20.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
20.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Tragic
25.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
33.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianMexican
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianMexican
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
79.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.59%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (64.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianMexican
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
69.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
31.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Excellent
47.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.48
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
45.2%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
36.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 25.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.5%).
Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianMexican
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
61.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
24.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 103.3%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianMexican
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
94.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
91.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
91.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
90.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
87.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
86.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
84.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
81.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
77.4%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Tragic
55.6%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
49.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
35.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
27.1%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.2%

Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Mexican Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianMexican
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
27.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
51.1%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%